Henrik Kleven
Kristian Jakobsen
Katrine Marie Jakobsen
Alessandro Guarnieri
Tanguy van Ypersele
Fabien Petit
Cecilia García-Peñalosa
Yonatan Berman
Nina Weber
Julian Limberg
David Hope
Pedro Tremacoldi-Rossi
Tatiana Mocanu
Marco Ranaldi
Silvia Vannutelli
Raymond Fisman
John Voorheis
Reed Walker
Janet Currie
Roel Dom
Marcos Vera-Hernández
Emla Fitzsimons
José V. Rodríguez Mora
Tomasa Rodrigo
Álvaro Ortiz
Stephen Hansen
Vasco Carvalho
Gergely Buda
Gabriel Zucman
Anders Jensen
Matthew Fisher-Post
José-Alberto Guerra
Myra Mohnen
Christopher Timmins
Ignacio Sarmiento-Barbieri
Peter Christensen
Linda Wu
Gaurav Khatri
Julián Costas-Fernández
Eleonora Patacchini
Jorgen Harris
Marco Battaglini
Ricardo Fernholz
Alberto Bisin
Jess Benhabib
Cian Ruane
Pete Klenow
Mark Bils
Peter Hull
Will Dobbie
David Arnold
Eric Zwick
Owen Zidar
Matt Smith
Ansgar Walther
Tarun Ramadorai
Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham
Andreas Fuster
Ellora Derenoncourt
Golvine de Rochambeau
Vinayak Iyer
Jonas Hjort
Elena Simintzi
Paige Ouimet
Holger Mueller
Pablo Garriga
Gabriel Ulyssea
Costas Meghir
Pinelopi Koujianou Goldberg
Rafael Dix-Carneiro
Alessandro Toppeta
Áureo de Paula
Orazio Attanasio
Seth Zimmerman
Joseph Price
Valerie Michelman
Camille Semelet
Anne Brockmeyer
Pierre Bachas
Santiago Pérez
Elisa Jácome
Leah Boustan
Ran Abramitzky
Jesse Rothstein
Jeffrey T. Denning
Sandra Black
Wei Cui
Mathieu Leduc
Philippe Jehiel
Shivam Gujral
Suraj Sridhar
Attila Lindner
Arindrajit Dube
Pascual Restrepo
Łukasz Rachel
Benjamin Moll
Kirill Borusyak
Michael McMahon
Frederic Malherbe
Gabor Pinter

Income composition inequality

What is this research about and why did you do it?

This paper is about introducing a novel lens through which we can view and understand the world. I call this lens compositional inequality. Compositional inequality describes differences between rich and poor in terms of the labour share and capital share of their income. When compositional inequality is high, the rich and the poor are earning from different sources – capital and labour income respectively. When, by contrast, compositional inequality is minimal, the rich and poor are earning income from capital and labour in the same proportion.

How did you answer this question?

To measure the degree of compositional inequality in capital and labour income in a society I introduce a novel indicator: the Income-Factor Concentration (IFC) index. The IFC varies between 1 and –1: it is equal to 1 when the rich earn entirely capital income and the poor entirely labour income, while it is equal to zero when the rich and the poor earn from both income sources in the same proportions. The higher the IFC index, the higher is compositional inequality. Compositional inequality links the functional with the personal distribution of income. The functional distribution of income describes the distribution of profits and wages in overall GDP, whilst the personal distribution describes how overall income is divided among individuals.

The higher is compositional inequality, the stronger the link between the functional and personal distributions: a ceteris paribus increase in profit share translates into an increase in income inequality, as profits are concentrated among the rich. This is well aligned with the discussion of the two distributions presented by Atkinson (2009) and Glyn (2011).

What did you find?

While classical political economists have described a historical demarcation between top income shares composed primarily of capital income and lower income shares fuelled by labour income, this separation fails to depict the world we live in today. Compositional inequality is in fact found to be far below its maximal value in almost all countries in the world, as shown in a recent article jointly written with Branko Milanovic (see figure below). The time and cause of the disappearance of this separation is an interesting matter for future time-series investigation.


Not all countries have, however, the same level of compositional inequality. Latin American countries like Mexico and Brazil are, for instance, characterised by high levels of compositional inequality. They can, therefore, be regarded as forms of classical capitalism, where rich individuals are capital income abundant and poor individuals labour income abundant. Interestingly, Nordic countries display similarly high compositional inequality, despite famously low income inequality. This raises important questions about the desirability of compositional equality.


Meanwhile, countries like Taiwan and Slovakia are characterised instead by low levels of compositional inequality. Intuitively, land redistribution in Taiwan may explain the lack of concentration of capital income among the rich. These countries are examples of an unprecedented ‘new capitalism,’ where rich and poor alike earn from both capital and labour incomes.

The graph shows on the horizontal axis compositional inequality, as measured by the IFC index, and on the vertical axis inter-personal income inequality, as measured by the Gini coefficient.

What implications does this have for the research on wealth concentration or economic inequality?

Is a society where rich and poor individuals simultaneously earn from capital and labour sources of income good for equality? This question is especially prompted by the observed coexistence of a high Income Factor Concentration Index with a low Gini. Further, compositional equality could carry implications for political stability and growth: while such equality could foster cooperation between income classes, could there be counterweighing efficiency losses from dispersing the gains of each factor? The notion of IFC proposed in this paper thus stimulates structured thinking on crucial economic questions. Their answers will allow us to think about the nature of a more equitable capitalism.

What are the next steps in your agenda?

The next step it about the development of a new theory of compositional equality, articulated through an interdisciplinary research agenda, to answer these fundamental questions about the nature of capitalism in the 21st century.

Citation and related resources

This paper can be cited as follows: Ranaldi, M. (2022). "Income Composition Inequality." Review of Income and Wealth, 68(1), pp. 139-160.

The following is other work by the author on the subject of compositional inequality:

For the interested reader, the following are resources alluded to in the summary above:

About the authors

Marco Ranaldi

Related Content