Alessandro Guarnieri
Tanguy van Ypersele
Fabien Petit
Cecilia García-Peñalosa
Yonatan Berman
Nina Weber
Julian Limberg
David Hope
Pedro Tremacoldi-Rossi
Tatiana Mocanu
Marco Ranaldi
Silvia Vannutelli
Raymond Fisman
John Voorheis
Reed Walker
Janet Currie
Roel Dom
Marcos Vera-Hernández
Emla Fitzsimons
José V. Rodríguez Mora
Tomasa Rodrigo
Álvaro Ortiz
Stephen Hansen
Vasco Carvalho
Gergely Buda
Gabriel Zucman
Anders Jensen
Matthew Fisher-Post
José-Alberto Guerra
Myra Mohnen
Christopher Timmins
Ignacio Sarmiento-Barbieri
Peter Christensen
Linda Wu
Gaurav Khatri
Julián Costas-Fernández
Eleonora Patacchini
Jorgen Harris
Marco Battaglini
Ricardo Fernholz
Alberto Bisin
Jess Benhabib
Cian Ruane
Pete Klenow
Mark Bils
Peter Hull
Will Dobbie
David Arnold
Eric Zwick
Owen Zidar
Matt Smith
Ansgar Walther
Tarun Ramadorai
Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham
Andreas Fuster
Ellora Derenoncourt
Golvine de Rochambeau
Vinayak Iyer
Jonas Hjort
Elena Simintzi
Paige Ouimet
Holger Mueller
Pablo Garriga
Gabriel Ulyssea
Costas Meghir
Pinelopi Koujianou Goldberg
Rafael Dix-Carneiro
Alessandro Toppeta
Áureo de Paula
Orazio Attanasio
Seth Zimmerman
Joseph Price
Valerie Michelman
Camille Semelet
Anne Brockmeyer
Pierre Bachas
Santiago Pérez
Elisa Jácome
Leah Boustan
Ran Abramitzky
Jesse Rothstein
Jeffrey T. Denning
Sandra Black
Wei Cui
Mathieu Leduc
Philippe Jehiel
Shivam Gujral
Suraj Sridhar
Attila Lindner
Arindrajit Dube
Pascual Restrepo
Łukasz Rachel
Benjamin Moll
Kirill Borusyak
Michael McMahon
Frederic Malherbe
Gabor Pinter
Angus Foulis
Saleem Bahaj
Stone Centre

Skill formation with siblings

What is your research about and why did you do it?

I study the joint production of human capital in families with siblings, where parent-child as well as sibling interactions can contribute to development during childhood. In these families, better-bonded siblings would be more connected and cooperative, which would promote pro-social behaviour among them. The importance of siblings and the quality of their bond for children's development have not been sufficiently explored, even though most children have at least one sibling. Policy has instead focused on stimulating interactions between parents and the target child. Understanding the role of siblings in the human capital formation process can provide another policy tool to tackle inequality.

How did you answer this question?

I use the Millennium Cohort Study data, which follows the lives of a representative sample of British children born in 2000–2002 and their families. Most notably, the age-5 wave provides information on how frequently siblings have positive interactions, such as when they have fun together. Using this knowledge, I can introduce a new variable called the sibling bond, which measures how well siblings get along with one another and allows me to think of both parents and siblings as players in the development process. First, I investigate if the age-5 sibling bond can explain children’s outcomes later in life. Second, I structurally estimate the production of human capital for the younger and older siblings, quantifying the contribution of the sibling bond and parental investment.

What did you find?

The main finding is that a high-quality bond between siblings matters over and beyond parental investment, with differences in the strength of the sibling bond being associated with persistent inequalities in children’s human capital. First, there is a socio-economic gradient in the quality of the sibling bond. Second, a high-quality bond between siblings at age 5 predicts better developmental, educational and health outcomes across adolescence and young adulthood. For example, I show that an increase in one standard deviation in the sibling bond at age 5 translates on average into an increase in 0.1 standard deviation in the younger sibling’s externalizing (ability to collaborate with others), internalizing (ability to focus to pursue long-term goals) and cognitive (ability to complete tasks and learn) skills across adolescence.

The figure presents: (i) the socio-economic gradient in the sibling bond at age 5 (left panel) and (ii) the point estimates in standard deviation units with the 95% confidence intervals from regressing the age-5 sibling bond on developmental outcomes across the younger sibling’s adolescence (right panel). The explanatory power of the age-5 sibling bond is robust to a large set of controls, including household characteristics, environmental factors and siblings’ skills. Results for internalizing and cognitive skills are presented in the paper.

What implications does this have for the research on wealth concentration or economic inequality?

The literature has shown how parent-child interactions and parents' abilities are contributing to the transmission of disadvantage across generations by estimating the technology of skill formation with a single child (Cunha and Heckman, 2008; Cunha, Heckman, and Schennach, 2010; Attanasio, Cattan, Fitzsimons, Meghir, and Rubio-Codina, 2020; Attanasio, Meghir, and Nix, 2020; Agostinelli and Wiswall, 2022). My work uncovers another mechanism relevant for understanding the transmission of disadvantage across generations, showing that siblings play an important role in the joint production of human capital through their interactions.

What are the next steps in your agenda?

My work offers fertile ground for developing novel interventions and policies that target siblings as well as their parents. I am working to consider such policy measures and collect new data on sibling interactions throughout the life cycle.


This paper can be cited as follows: Toppeta, A. (2022) "Skill formation with siblings." Working paper.

About the authors

Alessandro Toppeta

Related Content

expand icon


expand icon

Education materials